Navigating Complexities in Custom Litigation

A Comprehensive Guide

Navigating Complexities in Custom Litigation

A Comprehensive Guide

Introduction

Customs litigation in India is a multilayered and intricate area of law, about the interpretation and enforcement of the customs laws, regulations, and policies, alongside addressing disputes arising from matters of import and export of goods. India has continued to evolve as a global economic player, making customs law a significant pillar of international trade. Hence, navigating the complexities of customs litigation is essential for businesses and legal practitioners alike. This read aims to provide a general understanding of the key challenges, procedural aspects, and strategies involved in litigations related to such matters.

The Legal Framework of Customs Litigation in India

The Major law regarding India’s customs is Customs Act 1962. This act describes law and procedure for the levy and collection of customs, clearance of imported and export goods, valuation of imported and export goods, as well as prevention of smuggling and other unlawful activities of international trade. Besides, India has signed various international trade agreements, among which include WTO agreements, that affect both the interpretation and even the pleading of customs laws, along with its remedy.

This Act has entrusted the power of dealing with different aspects of customs litigation with various authorities. CBIC is entrusted with supervisory powers over the part of administration and implementation of the customs policies. Commissioners of Customs, Appellate Authorities, and other adjudicatory bodies handle matters and litigations that arise out of violation of customs regulations. Litigation in customs normally ranges from an allegation of some misdeed of customs authorities to classify goods, determine the value of imports, impose penalties, or calculate duties.

The Indian law, though it is structured, was disapproved for its complexities where the matters relate to laws and procedures of customs. In consequence, litigations in these areas are not only cumbersome but frustrate the parties and are burdensome for the courts to execute. These complexities need a deeper statutory grasp and strategic application in litigations of such issues.

Key Areas of Dispute in Customs Litigation

Classification of Goods: The most common issue that arises in customs litigation is classification of goods under appropriate customs tariff. India follows the Harmonized System (HS) Code for classification of products which is standardized all over the world. However, it is often a controversy regarding the proper way of classification of goods, especially when the goods are equipped with characteristics that can put them under various headings of the goods. A misclassification may address the impact of either the underpayment or overpayment in terms of customs duty along with subsequent penalties or disputes. Such classification disputes are often a significant component of customs litigation in India.
Merchandise Valuation: The customs duties in India are normally collected with reference to the transaction value of the imported goods themselves. There are constant valuation disputes with respect to imported merchandise, mainly when the declared value is held to be undervalued by the customs. The customs officers generally use some form of price comparison or resort to the “best judgment” approach if the declared value is challenged. The valuation of goods has often been a battleground in customs litigation, as importers and authorities seek to protect their interests.
Customs Duty and Tariff Classification: The very basis of customs litigation is the imposition of customs duty. Business houses often argue about the amount of duty levied by customs officials, which they assert has been wrongly calculated or that they are exempted from payment of duties under several schemes of the Government. The other factor is the recent GST, 2017, which has introduced new legal complexities and disputes in customs litigation primarily resulting from interaction between GST and customs duties.
Seizure and Confiscation of Goods: Customs authorities can seize and confiscate goods that contravene customs regulation. This may include misdeclaration of goods and smuggling. The party at such a time is allowed to present their case in court for the seizure or confiscation, which involves complicated procedures in customs litigation.
Penalties and Enforcement: Imposition of penalties for contravention of the customs law, failure to report as required or improper declaration of goods, has been an area of contention in customs litigations. The parties tend to litigate against those penalties arguing that they have not been based on proper evidence. Interpretations of sections under the Customs Act always relate to litigation on matters concerning the imposition of such penalties on the business in view, which could have ramifications far-reaching.

Procedural Aspects of Customs Litigation

In India, there exists a process involved in customs litigation, starting with a petition filed before the relevant adjudicating authority.

In customs litigation, aggrieved parties can start by filing an appeal before the Customs, Excise, and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal or High Court, according to the nature of the disagreement. Since it is an important forum for appeals associated with the customs authority’s ruling, the procedure of filling in at CESTAT is filed within the time and upon the production of relevant documents. Once an appeal is filed, the adjudicating body looks at the facts and requirements of applicable law, often bringing evidence before them, hearing witnesses, and seeking experts in cases requiring complicated problems like product classification or valuation. In case a party does not like the decision of CESTAT, they may file an appeal to High Court or Supreme Court under judicial review which determines whether the acts done by the adjudicating authority were valid and reasonable.

However, appeals take a lot of time and even cost quite a bit of money to acquire. Where urgency is in play, parties can still apply for interim relief by having an order suspended or put under stay of fines in avoidance of seizure or confiscation of goods. However, since litigation takes a relatively protracted period, there are alternative dispute resolutions to try: mediation and arbitration procedure that companies resort to instead; however, these appear grossly underutilized where matters related to customs are the point in contention.

Challenges in Customs Litigation in India

Several such factors increase the complexities involved in customs litigation in India:

Lack of Consistency in Decision-making: In the above, consistency is missing from customs litigation. The same legal document may be interpreted differently by different custom officers which brings forth conflicting verdicts. Thus, inconsistency gives rise to misconception, increased litigation, and increased legal costs to the organizations.
Adjudication Delay: The Indian judicial system does have backlogs and therefore many a times, the customs disputes end after years. Uncertainty among the firms and the disruption of smooth working of supply chains all over the world arises because of adjudication delay.
Complexity of Rules: The customs laws are dynamic and interlink with national and international laws, making it difficult to maintain compliance with customs laws. For example, duties, exclusions, and new rules can be very frequent changes and cause disputes that need quick resolution.
Cost of Litigation: This is another expensive aspect of Indian customs litigation particularly for small and medium-sized enterprises. Apart from legal costs, firms incur significant expenditures on compliance, record-keeping, and even expert opinion evidence.
Cross-border jurisdictional issues: Litigations relating to customs in India are replete with cross-border concerns like issues between the Indian authorities and the foreign governments or between the Indian companies and the foreign regulators, as trade has gone global. The process of litigation is usually cumbersome and often requires coordination with foreign legal systems.

Strategies for Effective Navigation of Customs Litigation

The strategic handling of the complexities and inbuilt obstacles of customs litigation is necessary for the smooth management and settlement of business disputes. Therefore, proactive customs compliance is a must as it keeps a business abreast of the latest customs regulations, tariffs, and trade agreements. Professional advice can prove to be handy in bringing forward the concerns of non-compliance even before things become grave issues. Equally important is ensuring that there is professional representation available with appropriate expertise in customs law and industrial practice to get procedural hurdles handled properly as well as build a robust case. While it is a relatively infrequently used dispute resolution tool for customs issues, other alternative dispute resolutions like mediation and arbitration may be much faster and more economical in front of formal court litigation. This means that timely filing of appeals and proper, complete maintenance of documentation are absolutely essential to avoid fines and rejection of claims, hence a need for maintaining updated and well-kept records of transactions and negotiations with customs authorities. Companies have to stay abreast of changes in regulations to prepare themselves for changes in trade agreements or rules of customs which may impact their operations. All this will put together a good basis for a reduction in risk and a negotiation of the complexity of customs in litigation.

Conclusion

The scenario, here in India, is highly complex and challenging for foreign companies conducting international trade in terms of customs litigation. It has to do with law regimes wherein the legal terrain shifts dramatically and unpredictably with respect to the complexity and multi-dimensionality of its tariff’s classification, nuances in value issues disputes, and its very frequent change in framework and regulation. A strategy well prepared with due knowledge needs to be employed to tread these obstacles. Even if it had avenues for dispute resolution, the authorities would have to take decisions in a much more consistent manner to hasten the building of a stable and business-friendly climate in an urgent manner. Organizations would also cut down significantly on the time and cost bounds of its procedures by embracing alternative dispute resolutions and accelerating the resolution process through greater judicial efficiency. With the rectification of systemic errors, customs litigation would be streamlined, thus strengthening the positions of India as being a trustworthy and open trading partner as it moves on into its assertion to be a world trading hub. In essence, for India to be able to maintain the surging interest in the world economy, a strong, effective, and equitable framework in customs litigation will demand cooperation from companies, attorneys, and lawmakers.

LEGALLANDS assist in services related to Custom Litigation, Corporate Litigation, NCLT cases, NCLAT cases etc. We also offer services related to Joint Ventures, Merger Acquisitions, Contract Conveyancing and Corporate Services, Business Set Up and Management Services, Foreign Trade Policies, Immigration Services, Regulatory Compliances, Legal Compliances, Logistics Support, International Dispute Resolution, Trade Regulations, and many more. We also assist in Due Diligence, Risk Assessment etc. Feel free to connect with us at connect@legallands.com. For further information visit our website on www.legallands.com.

Contact

Get the Legal Support You Deserve Schedule Your Free Consultation Now!

Take the first step toward expert legal support. Schedule your free consultation today and get the guidance you need to resolve your legal matters with confidence.

Navigating Complexities in Custom Litigation